[Mpi-22] [Mpi-forum] MPI 2.2 proposal: resolving MPI_Request_free issues

Richard Treumann treumann at [hidden]
Thu Jul 17 15:57:22 CDT 2008


How is this different from saying MPI_REQUEST_FREE was a mistake. The
behavior of an application that uses this call is undefined.

Of course we could add MPI_NO_REQUEST_FREE as an MPI_Init time assertion
and say that  any MPI implementation optimization that create the problems
Erez describes are only valid when the application has asserted
MPI_NO_REQUEST_FREE.

Dick Treumann  -  MPI Team/TCEM
IBM Systems & Technology Group
Dept 0lva / MS P963 -- 2455 South Road -- Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Tele (845) 433-7846         Fax (845) 433-8363

mpi-22-bounces_at_[hidden] wrote on 07/17/2008 03:40:55 PM:

>
> The text specifically would say that writing or freeing the buffer
> after calling MPI_Request_free is unsafe.
>
> Thanks,
> .Erez
>





* 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpi-22/attachments/20080717/807960f7/attachment.html>


More information about the Mpi-22 mailing list