[Mpi-21] Review of Chapter 14
Cownie, James H
james.h.cownie at [hidden]
Tue Mar 11 10:03:44 CDT 2008
> One is simple: the use of "which" versus "that". Style guides instruct
> that we use "that" for required clauses (if the clause were omitted
the
> sentence would not make sense, essentially).
My fault, I always get that wrong :-)
-- Jim
James Cownie <james.h.cownie_at_[hidden]>
SSG/DPD/PAT
Tel: +44 117 9071438
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi-21-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:mpi-21-bounces_at_lists.mpi-
> forum.org] On Behalf Of Bronis R. de Supinski
> Sent: 11 March 2008 14:45
> To: MPI 2.1 Mailing List
> Subject: [Mpi-21] Review of Chapter 14
>
>
> Rolf:
>
> Overall, this chapter looks pretty good. I only saw two general
issues.
> One is simple: the use of "which" versus "that". Style guides instruct
> that we use "that" for required clauses (if the clause were omitted
the
> sentence would not make sense, essentially). The other is that section
> 14.6 needs to be integrated into section 14.1 so that the document
reads
> as the MPI 2.1 standard rather than a straight merge of the MPI-1
standard
> with related sections of MPI-2.
>
> Specific edits for Chapter 14:
>
> [477:18-20] Currently reads:
>
> 1. provide a mechanism through which all of the MPI defined functions
may
> be accessed
> with a name shift. Thus all of the MPI functions (which normally
start
> with start with the prefix
> "MPI_") should also be accessible with the prefix "PMPI_".
>
> Integrate text from section 14.6; change to:
>
> 1. provide a mechanism through which all of the MPI defined functions
> (except those allowed as macros, see Section 2.6.5) may be accessed
> with a name shift. This requires, in C and Fortran, an alternate
entry
> point name, with the prefix PMPI_ for each MPI function. The
profiling
> interface in C++ is described in Section 13.1.10. For routines
> implemented as macros, it is still required that the PMPI_ version
be
> supplied and work as expected, but it is not possible to replace at
> link time the MPI_ version with a user-defined version.
>
> Related to this change, delete:
>
> [482:27-35]
>
> [477:33] Currently reads:
>
> This is necessary
>
> Antecedent is unclear; change to:
>
> This separability is necessary
>
> ------------------
>
> All other suggested changes are simple replacements of "which" by
"that".
> The following is a list of the relevant [page:line number] pairs:
>
> [477:30], [478:1], [478:28], [479:8], [481:7], [481:12], [481:22],
> [481:26],
> [481:29], [482:10], [482:11]
>
> --------------------
>
> That's it for that chapter. I'll send stuff for Chapter 9 next
although
> it might be easier for me to edit the tex file (with explanatory
comments)
> and then for you to do a diff. I'll look to see if it is available on
the
> web site...
>
> Bronis
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-21 mailing list
> mpi-21_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-21
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
More information about the Mpi-21
mailing list