[Mpi-21] Relevance of C++ MPI binding of www.boost.org

[Erez Haba]

Definitely the boost.mpi bindings are more useful; but I don't have the information if it is being used more.

For example Microsoft does not ship the C++ bindings for several reason; (like compiler incompatibilities), but does point to boost.mpi as the C++ binding of choice.

Thanks,
.Erez

-----Original Message-----
From: mpi-21-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi-21-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rolf Rabenseifner
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 9:09 AM
To: MPI 2.1 Mailing List
Cc: Martin Bernreuther
Subject: [Mpi-21] Relevance of C++ MPI binding of www.boost.org

All C++ MPI specialists,

which relevance has the MPI C++ binding of Boost ( http://www.boost.org/ )?
In the actual version 1.35
http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1_35_0
one can find a "C++-friendly interface to the standard Message
Passing Interface".

The comment from boost:
"Although there exist C++ bindings for MPI, they offer little functionality over the C bindings."

Is there any knowledge of whether in real C++ programming, whether
the official C++ MPI binding or the C++ boost MPI binding is
more often used in the C++ community?

For me, the answer may have implications on how separate or integrated
additional bindings should be integrated into the language
independent text of the MPI standard.

Best regards
Rolf

PS: As non-C++-specialist, this question is based on a question from
    Martin Bernreuther. The citations are from him.

Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner_at_[hidden]
High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530
University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832
Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner
Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30)
_______________________________________________
mpi-21 mailing list
mpi-21_at_[hidden]
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-21