<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Thanks, Jeff. I’ll update the note on 369. Note that 359 is marked as passed but not closed; its probably one of the ones that can just be closed.<div><br></div><div>Does your shared memory proposal subsume the first item?</div><div><br></div><div>Bill</div><div><br><div><div>On Sep 25, 2014, at 9:34 AM, Jeff Hammond <<a href="mailto:jeff.science@gmail.com">jeff.science@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">Per the history therein,<br><a href="https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/369">https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/369</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>passed the<br>first vote in Chicago in June. Why do you think it has been dropped?<br><br>I thought<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/359">https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/359</a><br>passed but there's no clear evidence of this on the ticket.<br><br>I previously updated<br><a href="https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/mpi3-rma-agenda">https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/mpi3-rma-agenda</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>to<br>reflect my intended activities:<br><br>Draft Agenda for MPI-3 RMA Working Group: December 2014<br><br>#396 - RMA needs new assertions for passive-target epochs. Current<br>status (3/14): Add these assertions. Text needed.<br>#397 - extend the use of MPI_WIN_SHARED_QUERY to all windows. Current<br>status (3/14): Text proposed, straw vote 4/2/0.<br>#401 - MPI_IN_PLACE in MPI_Get_accumulate<br>#416 - MPI Accumulate operation restrictions<br><br>In particular, I will have a relatively large proposal related to<br>shared memory, which will be part of #397 (the scope of this ticket is<br>evolving).<br><br>Jeff<br><br>On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:19 AM, William Gropp <<a href="mailto:wgropp@illinois.edu">wgropp@illinois.edu</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">I looked through all of the tickets and wrote a summary of the open issues, which I’ve attached. I propose the following:<br><br>Determine which of these issues can be resolved by email. A significant number can probably be closed with no further action.<br><br>For those requiring rework, determine if there is still interest in them, and if not, close them as well.<br><br>For the ones requiring discussion, assign someone to organize a position and discussion. We can schedule telecons to go over those issues. The first item in the list is certainly in this class.<br><br>Comments?<br><br>Bill<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>mpiwg-rma mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mpiwg-rma@lists.mpi-forum.org">mpiwg-rma@lists.mpi-forum.org</a><br>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma<br></blockquote><br><br><br>--<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br>Jeff Hammond<br><a href="mailto:jeff.science@gmail.com">jeff.science@gmail.com</a><br><a href="http://jeffhammond.github.io/">http://jeffhammond.github.io/</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>mpiwg-rma mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mpiwg-rma@lists.mpi-forum.org">mpiwg-rma@lists.mpi-forum.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma">http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma</a></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>