[Mpi3-rma] MPI-3 UNIFIED model clarification

[Jed Brown]

"Underwood, Keith D" <keith.d.underwood at intel.com> writes:

> The point of UNIFIED was that we add a more useful model that worked
> in *some* places.

Keith, should the standard include an example of UNIFIED that is
portable, but does not call MPI_Win_sync?

If so, what memory model should be assumed?  (C11 seems like a likely
candidate, though I think the best quality documentation on these
affairs is associated with the Linux kernel, and is readily implemented
without language extensions.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-rma/attachments/20130802/3dfbcabd/attachment-0001.pgp>