<div dir="ltr">Hi Rich,<div><br></div><div>The discussion on info keys started with a "thread_level" info key in the hybrid working group, and for better or worse it expanded and stayed within that WG. I agree that this could be organized better, and hopefully we can find a good solution at the upcoming meeting.</div><div><br>That being said, you haven't missed much. The technical discussion on info keys proposals took place primarily at the past few face to face meetings. We still have lots of great input from those discussions queued up on the original ticket. I'm sure many Forum members remember the lively discussions we had about communicator info keys. During those discussions, we didn't agree on much, but we did reach something resembling consensus on the wildcards info keys. The working group wanted to move those items to a proper proposal so that the Forum has the opportunity to include them in MPI 3.1.</div><div><br></div><div>Let's figure out the right forum(s) for discussion on the remaining info keys and keep them moving along.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div> ~Jim.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Richard Graham <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richardg@mellanox.com" target="_blank">richardg@mellanox.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Why is such a proposal coming out of the hybrid working group ? This is more appropriate for the point-to-point working group. Not that it is that critical
what the group name is, but more to get feedback from a wide range of folks interested is such topics.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Rich<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif"> mpi-forum [mailto:<a href="mailto:mpi-forum-bounces@lists.mpi-forum.org" target="_blank">mpi-forum-bounces@lists.mpi-forum.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Jim Dinan<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, November 22, 2014 8:58 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Main MPI Forum mailing list<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Mpi-forum] Info Keys Ticket<u></u><u></u></span></p><div><div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi All,<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The hybrid working group would like to put forward ticket #461 (<a href="https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/461" target="_blank">https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/461</a>) for consideration for MPI 3.1, with a formal
reading at the upcoming December meeting.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">This ticket proposes the no_any_tag and no_any_source info keys, on which we have achieved consensus. We continue to have vigorous and productive debate on additional communicator info keys proposals that have been captured in #381. We
will pursue these additional proposals for MPI 4.0.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks and see you in December,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> ~Jim.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
mpi-forum mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org" target="_blank">mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum" target="_blank">http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>