I am no the hook to produce a first draft of a document for this. I am
planning to do this later in the week, after I finish the 2.1 document
reviews I need to do.
Rich
On 3/3/08 8:45 AM, "Josh Hursey" <jjhursey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'd like to start the discussion on the proposal for "defining
> communicator state with process loss", or recoverability of MPI state
> in the presence of process loss.
>
> To start the discussion I am suggesting that folks have a look at the
> following paper since I think it relates to quite a number of related
> topics:
>
> Fagg, G., et. al. "Extending the MPI Specification for Process Fault
> Tolerance on High Performance Computing Systems"
> http://icl.cs.utk.edu/projectsfiles/ftmpi/pubs/isc2004-FT-MPI.pdf
>
> ----
> Josh Hursey
> Graduate Student, Indiana University
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mpi3-ft mailing list
> Mpi3-ft_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../images/flag-us.gif){kind=small}