> >> There is not new API, would just need to pass some sort of
> parameter to MPI_Init(). This
> >> is not the only place this is needed. If you want to take a
> look at the implementation, take
> >> a loot at http://public.lanl.gov/lampi
>
Right, LAMPI! Yeah, its not a transactional API but rather a more
reliable implementation of MPI. This is also good but its probably
not something related to transactional messages since the
transactional messages API is meant to define how message errors are
exported to the application. LAMPI and similar stuff would be more
related to a QoS API that allows the application to trade off
performance for reliability.
Greg Bronevetsky
Post-Doctoral Researcher
1028 Building 451
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
(925) 424-5756
bronevetsky1_at_[hidden]
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../images/flag-us.gif){kind=small}