MPI Forum: mpi3-fortran Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [MPI3 Fortran] Summary of items on the table
From: Aleksandar Donev (donev1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-28 20:31:49

• Next message: Aleksandar Donev: "Re: [MPI3 Fortran] Summary of items on the table"
• Previous message: Bill Long: "Re: [MPI3 Fortran] Summary of items on the table"
• In reply to: Bill Long: "Re: [MPI3 Fortran] Summary of items on the table"
• Next in thread: Aleksandar Donev: "Re: [MPI3 Fortran] Summary of items on the table"

Bill Long wrote:

> I'm guessing that you mean bind(c) interfaces that are limited by a new
> LANG="C" specifier to be for functions actually written in C.
Yes.

> I think the
> original option 3 is better than class(*).
Yes. I was stating that it behaves, in terms of argument matching and
semantics, as if the dummy were CLASS(*), even though it is actually
TYPE(C_VOID).

Aleks

• Next message: Aleksandar Donev: "Re: [MPI3 Fortran] Summary of items on the table"
• Previous message: Bill Long: "Re: [MPI3 Fortran] Summary of items on the table"
• In reply to: Bill Long: "Re: [MPI3 Fortran] Summary of items on the table"
• Next in thread: Aleksandar Donev: "Re: [MPI3 Fortran] Summary of items on the table"